<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using wireframes or prototypes to elicit, analyze, and validate software requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/</link>
	<description>Advance Your Business Analysis Career</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:08:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A more thorough User eXperience steps breakdown &#171; Code For Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-10858</link>
		<dc:creator>A more thorough User eXperience steps breakdown &#171; Code For Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/?p=847#comment-10858</guid>
		<description>[...] Wireframe prototypes 12.3.1 User [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wireframe prototypes 12.3.1 User [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelvi</title>
		<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-10638</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/?p=847#comment-10638</guid>
		<description>This is a very good article. According to Laura, &quot;wire-framing activities actually come before any sort of user interface specification &quot;.  So I am a bit confused regarding this statement.  Becasue if the wire-frames are done before the specification/func specs, the what exactly the role of a BA?  Because some times the person who does wire-frames will do all the research to what to display on a website.  So the BA has to look at the wire-frame and just write a requirement.  So how this would be a challenging/interesting job for a BA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good article. According to Laura, &#8220;wire-framing activities actually come before any sort of user interface specification &#8220;.  So I am a bit confused regarding this statement.  Becasue if the wire-frames are done before the specification/func specs, the what exactly the role of a BA?  Because some times the person who does wire-frames will do all the research to what to display on a website.  So the BA has to look at the wire-frame and just write a requirement.  So how this would be a challenging/interesting job for a BA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Brandenburg</title>
		<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-10343</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Brandenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/?p=847#comment-10343</guid>
		<description>It depends. What question are you trying to answer by having the customer name listed multiple times? If you are answering a question that someone needs to review, approve, and implement and this is the best way to communicate the information, then I would say you are using the right approach. If not, consider revisions. It&#039;s really hard to say out of context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends. What question are you trying to answer by having the customer name listed multiple times? If you are answering a question that someone needs to review, approve, and implement and this is the best way to communicate the information, then I would say you are using the right approach. If not, consider revisions. It&#8217;s really hard to say out of context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kai</title>
		<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-10270</link>
		<dc:creator>kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/?p=847#comment-10270</guid>
		<description>I guess I am looking at this as a technical UI specification but maybe it should be part of the requirement for the Users? In this case the numbers would confuse them?

So should I have 2 types of screen shots? One with the numbers and one with data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am looking at this as a technical UI specification but maybe it should be part of the requirement for the Users? In this case the numbers would confuse them?</p>
<p>So should I have 2 types of screen shots? One with the numbers and one with data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kai</title>
		<link>http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/using-wireframes-or-prototypes-to-elicit-analyze-and-validate-software-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-10269</link>
		<dc:creator>kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/?p=847#comment-10269</guid>
		<description>Your right the data is not important to the stakeholders but more so to the implementation. So what I did was take the data sheet and added it as an Appendix A- Data Mapping. I left the numbers next to the labels on the screenshots but thinking maybe I should take them off. Not sure

Question when I am mapping labels should I have more than one label for the same thing? For example I have “Customer Name” on 5 forms in my spreadsheet should I repeat it or just refer to it one time?
 Label 1 Customer Name
Label 8 Customer Name
Label 21 Customer Name</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right the data is not important to the stakeholders but more so to the implementation. So what I did was take the data sheet and added it as an Appendix A- Data Mapping. I left the numbers next to the labels on the screenshots but thinking maybe I should take them off. Not sure</p>
<p>Question when I am mapping labels should I have more than one label for the same thing? For example I have “Customer Name” on 5 forms in my spreadsheet should I repeat it or just refer to it one time?<br />
 Label 1 Customer Name<br />
Label 8 Customer Name<br />
Label 21 Customer Name</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

